Featured Article : Mandatory UK Digital ID Mandatory By 2029
UK Prime Minister, Keir Starmer, has announced that digital ID will become mandatory to prove the right to work in the UK by 2029, triggering both ministerial praise and civil liberties concerns.
Petition
Interestingly, a petition on the UK Government’s site : https://petition.parliament.uk/ had attracted approaching three million signatures of people opposed to the bill, within a week of the announcement being made.
Rolled out by 2029
The Prime Minister has confirmed that a new digital identity scheme will be introduced across the UK by 2029, with every citizen and legal resident required to use a digital ID to prove their right to work.
Mandatory
The new ID will be free and optional for those not seeking employment, but will be compulsory for anyone taking up paid work. The government says it will replace paper documents and National Insurance numbers for right-to-work checks, with full implementation expected before the next general election. The government also says that, by law, this must take place no later than August 2029.
What Form Will It Take?
The government says the digital ID will be a secure, app-based credential stored on people’s mobile phones using the GOV.UK Wallet system. It will include core personal information such as name, date of birth, nationality or residency status, and a photo. The app will act as a proof of identity and legal right to work, with data encrypted and held directly on the user’s device.
The system has been designed to allow users to share only the information needed in each situation, for example, confirming eligibility to work without revealing unrelated personal details. If a phone is lost or stolen, the credential can be revoked remotely and reissued.
The government says this will replace the need to provide paper copies of documents such as passports or residence permits, and will become the standard method of proving work eligibility across the UK labour market.
Why?
The government says the scheme is designed to reduce illegal working, deter unauthorised migration, and improve the consistency of identity checks. Ministers argue that illegal employment remains a key draw for people entering the UK without permission, and that a digital system will make enforcement more effective.
The new ID is also framed as a broader tool for improving access to public services. It is hoped that over time, it could be used to simplify applications for childcare, benefits, driving licences, and tax records, although these uses will be optional, not mandatory.
In a statement issued through Downing Street, Prime Minister Keir Starmer said: “Digital ID is an enormous opportunity for the UK. It will make it tougher to work illegally in this country, making our borders more secure.”
However, some opponents believe the move is motivated more by political positioning than practical enforcement. For example, with pressure mounting over small boat crossings and immigration policy, privacy campaigners argue that the scheme could have been designed primarily to reassure voters rather than address the root causes of illegal working.
Previous attempts
It should be noted here that this is not the first time a UK government has proposed a national identity scheme. Back in the early 2000s, then-Prime Minister Tony Blair introduced plans for a physical ID card, which became law in 2006. The cards were intended to help combat terrorism, immigration abuse, and benefit fraud, and were linked to a central National Identity Register.
However, the scheme faced widespread opposition on civil liberties grounds and was criticised for being expensive, intrusive, and ineffective. In 2010, the incoming Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition government scrapped the programme and destroyed the database. At the time, the Home Secretary called it a “high-cost, high-risk” scheme that offered little public benefit.
Although the new digital ID plan differs in format, with no central identity register and no requirement to carry or show ID in public, it seems that many of the same concerns about privacy and state overreach have re-emerged.
Encrypted
Although the digital ID will be held on a person’s phone in the form of a secure app-based wallet, similar to the NHS app or mobile payment cards, it will use encrypted, on-device storage so that if a phone is lost, the credential can be immediately revoked and reissued.
For Working Legally
Current right-to-work rules already require employers to check and retain copies of identity documents, such as passports or biometric residence permits, or to use the Home Office online service. Civil penalties for non-compliance can be up to £60,000 per illegal worker for repeat offences.
Ministers say the new digital ID will therefore reduce the risk of fraud, speed up hiring, and close off loopholes that currently allow the use of borrowed or forged documents. It is also intended to help enforcement agencies identify patterns of non-compliance across the labour market, including in casual and gig economy roles.
According to the Cabinet Office, “a new streamlined digital system to check right to work will simplify the process, drive up compliance, crack down on forged documents and create intelligence data on businesses.”
Border Security
The policy has also been presented by the Prime Minister as a key part of the government’s approach to tackling illegal migration (which has been much in the news lately). In a statement issued through Downing Street, he said: “Digital ID is an enormous opportunity for the UK. It will make it tougher to work illegally in this country, making our borders more secure.”
He added: “We are doing the hard graft to deliver a fairer Britain for those who want to see change, not division. That is at the heart of our Plan for Change.”
Ministers argue that access to informal work is a major incentive for people entering the country without permission. By requiring all legal workers to use digital ID, the government hopes to reduce the so-called “pull factor” of illegal employment.
What Is (And Isn’t) Required
The government says the digital ID will be required only for those seeking paid employment. There are no plans to require it for everyday activities such as accessing healthcare or public spaces, and people will not be expected to carry proof of identity at all times. For example, the government materials explicitly state that “there will be no requirement for individuals to carry their ID or be asked to produce it” outside of employment-related checks.
However, the digital ID is expected to become increasingly useful for other tasks, such as accessing childcare, welfare, or tax records. It’s understood these uses will be optional, with ministers presenting them as convenience features rather than legal requirements.
Access And Inclusion
While the system is designed primarily for smartphone use, ministers have also confirmed that physical alternatives will be made available for people who are digitally excluded. This may include older people, those experiencing homelessness, or individuals without regular access to internet-connected devices.
Consultation Planned
A formal public consultation will launch later this year, seeking input on how to design the system inclusively. The government says this will include engagement with charities and local authorities, as well as face-to-face outreach and support services.
The Cabinet Office says the aim is to create “a service that takes the best aspects of the digital identification systems that are already up and running around the world,” while ensuring it “works for those who aren’t able to use a smartphone.”
Used In Other Countries
Some other countries already have working digital ID schemes. Examples of these that the UK’s digital ID model draws on include Estonia, Denmark, Australia, and India. For example:
– In Estonia, citizens use a mandatory digital ID for voting, healthcare, banking, and education, supported by strong encryption and decentralised systems.
– In Denmark, a MitID credential is used for logging into government and banking services, though it is not compulsory for all citizens.
– Australia’s national Digital ID system allows residents to access public services through apps like myGov, with varying levels of identity strength depending on the use case.
– In India, the Aadhaar system assigns a unique biometric ID number to over a billion people, primarily to streamline welfare and reduce fraud.
Ministers say the UK version will focus on privacy by design, with data stored locally on the user’s device and shared selectively.
Public Reaction And Political Response
The announcement has triggered a divided response across the political spectrum. Supporters argue it will modernise outdated systems and improve national security, while opponents say it risks overreach and mission creep.
More than one million people have already signed a Parliamentary petition opposing the introduction of digital ID, with civil liberties groups warning of long-term consequences for personal freedom. For example, Big Brother Watch, a UK-based privacy campaign group, said: “Plans for a mandatory digital ID would make us all reliant on a digital pass to go about our daily lives, turning us into a checkpoint society that is wholly un-British.”
Also, Liberty, the human rights organisation, expressed concern, stating that the proposals raise “huge concerns about mass surveillance” and could increase barriers for vulnerable people trying to access work or support.
Opposition politicians have also criticised both the scale of the scheme and the lack of debate. For example, Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch has questioned the cost, saying the government should focus on better enforcement of existing laws. The SNP and Northern Ireland’s First Minister have also raised concerns about the implications for devolved powers and the rights of Irish citizens.
Employers And Service Providers
Businesses will need to adjust their onboarding and compliance processes once the new system is in place. The government says it will issue new guidance and offer integration options, but employers may face practical questions around adoption timelines, system compatibility, and staff training.
The Home Office is expected to update its employer toolkits and codes of practice during the rollout. Officials have said the changes will reduce red tape in the long term but acknowledge that transitional support may be needed.
There is no requirement yet for employers to take any action, but the digital ID scheme is likely to become the default verification method once legislation is passed. The Department for Science, Innovation and Technology has said it is working with industry groups and software providers to ensure compatibility and reduce disruption.
Security And Safeguards
In terms of security and privacy, according to the Cabinet Office, the digital ID will use “state-of-the-art encryption and user authentication to ensure data is held and accessed securely.” The information will remain under the control of the user, stored on their device and not in a centralised database.
The government says the system is designed to limit personal data sharing, with users able to present only the specific information required for a given situation. For example, an employer might only see proof of work eligibility without accessing unrelated personal details.
If a device is lost or compromised, the credential can be cancelled and reissued. The government says this offers better protection than paper-based documents, which are easier to forge or misuse.
Challenges And Unanswered Questions
Despite assurances around data security and voluntary usage beyond employment, it must be said that there remain some unresolved concerns about the scope and risks of the new digital ID system. For example:
– Inclusion will require careful planning and proper resourcing to ensure fair access for people without smartphones, stable housing, or standard documents.
– Privacy and data safety remain a concern, with campaigners warning that even encrypted systems are not immune to hacking or misuse.
– Cost and complexity are still unclear, as the government has not yet published a full estimate of programme costs or explained how the rollout will be phased.
– Public trust will be critical, especially given the level of opposition from civil liberties groups and the wider concerns already raised across Parliament.
What Does This Mean For Your Business?
If delivered effectively, it’s possible to see how a digital ID scheme could bring some long-term operational benefits to UK businesses, i.e. by reducing the administrative burden of right-to-work checks and making fraud harder to commit. A single, standardised credential could simplify hiring, especially in sectors where temporary or remote onboarding is common. Employers, however, will want clear timelines, technical support, and assurance that they won’t be exposed to new liabilities during the transition.
Public reaction to the scheme is likely to remain mixed. While those in work will be legally required to adopt the new system, others may choose to use it to access public services more easily. The success of the rollout will depend heavily on how well the government delivers inclusive access for people who do not have smartphones or consistent digital connectivity. Ministers have promised support and consultation, but this remains a key point of scrutiny.
However, it’s clear already that the wider political and civil liberties questions are unlikely to go away. Campaigners continue to warn of surveillance risks and creeping functionality, especially if the ID becomes more widely used in everyday life over time. The comparison with previous ID card proposals is unavoidable. Although this version is digital-only, decentralised, and limited in scope, it revives long-standing concerns about privacy and state control.
As with other large digital infrastructure programmes, the practical outcomes will depend on delivery, not just design. That includes building trust, preventing mission creep, and ensuring the system works reliably in the real world. For now, businesses and citizens alike will be watching closely as the consultation opens and the legislation begins its passage through Parliament.
